https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156469 A suspension settlement was read as covering past suspension and lay-off only, so it did not bar wages for later reinstatement after inquiry; domestic inquiries were defective where witness statements were not supplied in advance and cross-examination followed immediately without proper examination-in-chief. The charge of inciting co-workers to slow down work was upheld on the substance of the evidence despite a variation in wording, so the dismissals were maintained. Reinstated workmen were entitled to full wages from the relevant suspension date, while the tribunal's limited compensation for the remaining workmen was substantially maintained. en-us Wed, 03 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Sep 2013 13:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156469 A suspension settlement was read as covering past suspension and lay-off only, so it did not bar wages for later reinstatement after inquiry; domestic inquiries were defective where witness statements were not supplied in advance and cross-examination followed immediately without proper examination-in-chief. The charge of inciting co-workers to slow down work was upheld on the substance of the evidence despite a variation in wording, so the dismissals were maintained. Reinstated workmen were entitled to full wages from the relevant suspension date, while the tribunal's limited compensation for the remaining workmen was substantially maintained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156469