https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156455 A later recruitment rule prescribing qualifying experience for Principal prevailed over the earlier, inconsistent experience requirement in the Intermediate Education regulations, because the statute preserved prior regulations only to the extent they were not inconsistent with the Act and Rules. The post of Principal was held outside the reservation regime and could not be subjected to reservation as a single post cadre. Clubbing existing and likely vacancies for the year of recruitment, and region-wise selection, were held consistent with the statutory scheme and not shown to violate equality. The cut-off date for regularisation of ad hoc Principals was upheld as having a rational nexus with the legislative scheme. en-us Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156455 A later recruitment rule prescribing qualifying experience for Principal prevailed over the earlier, inconsistent experience requirement in the Intermediate Education regulations, because the statute preserved prior regulations only to the extent they were not inconsistent with the Act and Rules. The post of Principal was held outside the reservation regime and could not be subjected to reservation as a single post cadre. Clubbing existing and likely vacancies for the year of recruitment, and region-wise selection, were held consistent with the statutory scheme and not shown to violate equality. The cut-off date for regularisation of ad hoc Principals was upheld as having a rational nexus with the legislative scheme. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156455