<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 302 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156451</link>
    <description>Section 8(4) of the Central Sales Tax Act permits the prescribed authority to accept C forms after the prescribed time where sufficient cause is established. Rule 12(7) sets a filing limit up to assessment, but its proviso cannot restrict the statutory sufficient-cause standard or prevent effective exercise of the statutory power. The power to allow belated declarations necessarily includes ancillary authority to reopen a completed assessment when reopening is required to give effect to that permission. A request for reopening must therefore be assessed on whether sufficient cause exists, rather than rejected for want of reopening power.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 17:50:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 302 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156451</link>
      <description>Section 8(4) of the Central Sales Tax Act permits the prescribed authority to accept C forms after the prescribed time where sufficient cause is established. Rule 12(7) sets a filing limit up to assessment, but its proviso cannot restrict the statutory sufficient-cause standard or prevent effective exercise of the statutory power. The power to allow belated declarations necessarily includes ancillary authority to reopen a completed assessment when reopening is required to give effect to that permission. A request for reopening must therefore be assessed on whether sufficient cause exists, rather than rejected for want of reopening power.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>