<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 338 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156410</link>
    <description>A broad definition of &quot;dealer&quot; under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act covered an advertising agency that procured and supplied printed materials and blocks in its own name, so the petitioner was treated as a dealer. The supply of those blocks and printed materials was regarded as a taxable sale because the agency placed orders directly with printers and block-makers, had no privity between customer and printer, and transferred the finished goods after acquiring them. Escaped-assessment proceedings were held time-barred because reassessment commenced only when the show-cause notice was issued after the assessment year ended; a prior notice seeking books was merely investigative and did not start limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 14:22:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 338 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156410</link>
      <description>A broad definition of &quot;dealer&quot; under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act covered an advertising agency that procured and supplied printed materials and blocks in its own name, so the petitioner was treated as a dealer. The supply of those blocks and printed materials was regarded as a taxable sale because the agency placed orders directly with printers and block-makers, had no privity between customer and printer, and transferred the finished goods after acquiring them. Escaped-assessment proceedings were held time-barred because reassessment commenced only when the show-cause notice was issued after the assessment year ended; a prior notice seeking books was merely investigative and did not start limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>