<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 398 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156389</link>
    <description>A referable common question of law arose where the Tribunal had passed a common order and the dispute concerned the propriety of directing the Additional Commissioner to pass the final order under the M.P. General Sales Tax Act. On that basis, the applications seeking a reference were maintainable, and the Tribunal was directed to state the case and refer the common question of law to the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:35:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 398 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156389</link>
      <description>A referable common question of law arose where the Tribunal had passed a common order and the dispute concerned the propriety of directing the Additional Commissioner to pass the final order under the M.P. General Sales Tax Act. On that basis, the applications seeking a reference were maintainable, and the Tribunal was directed to state the case and refer the common question of law to the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>