https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156386 Pre-execution interference with a detention order under Articles 226 and 32 is confined to narrow exceptions: where the order is not made under the Act, is directed against the wrong person, is issued for a wrong purpose, rests on vague, extraneous or irrelevant grounds, or is made by an authority lacking power. Here, the detention order had not been served and the grounds were not available on record, but the case did not fall within any recognised exception. The allegation of vagueness or irrelevant grounds could not be sustained on the material before the Court. The pre-execution challenge was therefore not maintainable, and the detention order was not interfered with. en-us Thu, 03 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Jun 2014 10:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156386 Pre-execution interference with a detention order under Articles 226 and 32 is confined to narrow exceptions: where the order is not made under the Act, is directed against the wrong person, is issued for a wrong purpose, rests on vague, extraneous or irrelevant grounds, or is made by an authority lacking power. Here, the detention order had not been served and the grounds were not available on record, but the case did not fall within any recognised exception. The allegation of vagueness or irrelevant grounds could not be sustained on the material before the Court. The pre-execution challenge was therefore not maintainable, and the detention order was not interfered with. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 03 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156386