<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (9) TMI 311 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156385</link>
    <description>Administrative charges included in the pricing structure could not be excluded from taxable turnover as a deductible item under the Karnataka Sales Tax Rules, 1957, because deductions are allowed only when specifically authorised by the rule. The assessee failed to produce sales invoices or other reliable sales records showing that the amount was outside the sale price, and the separate credit in the books was treated as a matter of accounting convenience rather than proof of a permissible exclusion. On that basis, the charges were held to form part of the taxable sale price and the claimed deduction was disallowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:29:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (9) TMI 311 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156385</link>
      <description>Administrative charges included in the pricing structure could not be excluded from taxable turnover as a deductible item under the Karnataka Sales Tax Rules, 1957, because deductions are allowed only when specifically authorised by the rule. The assessee failed to produce sales invoices or other reliable sales records showing that the amount was outside the sale price, and the separate credit in the books was treated as a matter of accounting convenience rather than proof of a permissible exclusion. On that basis, the charges were held to form part of the taxable sale price and the claimed deduction was disallowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>