<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 561 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156384</link>
    <description>Disciplinary proceedings may continue after superannuation under Regulation 20(3)(iii) only where they were validly initiated before retirement. Initiation occurs upon issuance of a charge-sheet, not through a show-cause notice or preliminary action. A charge-sheet issued after retirement cannot trigger the legal fiction treating the officer as continuing in service; the proceedings are therefore without jurisdiction. Consequently, the charge-sheet, enquiry report, removal order and appellate order are invalid. Retiral benefits must be paid, with the Court exercising its power to do complete justice despite the differing reasoning adopted by the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 561 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156384</link>
      <description>Disciplinary proceedings may continue after superannuation under Regulation 20(3)(iii) only where they were validly initiated before retirement. Initiation occurs upon issuance of a charge-sheet, not through a show-cause notice or preliminary action. A charge-sheet issued after retirement cannot trigger the legal fiction treating the officer as continuing in service; the proceedings are therefore without jurisdiction. Consequently, the charge-sheet, enquiry report, removal order and appellate order are invalid. Retiral benefits must be paid, with the Court exercising its power to do complete justice despite the differing reasoning adopted by the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>