<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1216 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156379</link>
    <description>Where service rules allocate disciplinary power by grade and posting, the CMD of a subsidiary company may be competent to initiate proceedings against an executive, even if major penalties rest elsewhere. A de novo enquiry wipes out the earlier charge-sheet and requires fresh, valid initiation by the competent authority; revival on the old charge-sheet is invalid. Allegations of mala fides must rest on specific pleadings and cogent material, and a bare assertion of bias is insufficient. Back wages do not automatically follow setting aside of dismissal and depend on the facts and the outcome of the fresh enquiry, so immediate payment was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1216 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156379</link>
      <description>Where service rules allocate disciplinary power by grade and posting, the CMD of a subsidiary company may be competent to initiate proceedings against an executive, even if major penalties rest elsewhere. A de novo enquiry wipes out the earlier charge-sheet and requires fresh, valid initiation by the competent authority; revival on the old charge-sheet is invalid. Allegations of mala fides must rest on specific pleadings and cogent material, and a bare assertion of bias is insufficient. Back wages do not automatically follow setting aside of dismissal and depend on the facts and the outcome of the fresh enquiry, so immediate payment was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>