https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156352 The High Court partly allowed the State's appeal, convicting Rukia Begum, Nasreen, and Mohammed Ghouse under Section 302 and 120-B of the IPC, sentencing them to life imprisonment. Rukia Begum and Nasreen were acquitted due to insufficient evidence, while Issaq Sait and Mujahid were found guilty and sentenced to life and seven years, respectively, based on strong evidence linking them to the crime. Rukia Begum's and Nasreen's appeals were allowed, leading to Rukia Begum's release, while Issaq Sait and Mujahid's appeal was dismissed, upholding their convictions. en-us Mon, 04 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Sep 2013 17:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156352 The High Court partly allowed the State's appeal, convicting Rukia Begum, Nasreen, and Mohammed Ghouse under Section 302 and 120-B of the IPC, sentencing them to life imprisonment. Rukia Begum and Nasreen were acquitted due to insufficient evidence, while Issaq Sait and Mujahid were found guilty and sentenced to life and seven years, respectively, based on strong evidence linking them to the crime. Rukia Begum's and Nasreen's appeals were allowed, leading to Rukia Begum's release, while Issaq Sait and Mujahid's appeal was dismissed, upholding their convictions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 04 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156352