<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 327 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156300</link>
    <description>The High Court considered the applicability of a circular in penalty proceedings under section 4-B of the Act. The Court found the circular&#039;s relevance debatable, impacting the calculation of penalties. As the circular was specifically relied upon by the assessee during proceedings, the Court allowed the revision, quashing the penalty order under section 22.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:31:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 327 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156300</link>
      <description>The High Court considered the applicability of a circular in penalty proceedings under section 4-B of the Act. The Court found the circular&#039;s relevance debatable, impacting the calculation of penalties. As the circular was specifically relied upon by the assessee during proceedings, the Court allowed the revision, quashing the penalty order under section 22.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>