<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (7) TMI 332 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156297</link>
    <description>A second seller is entitled to exemption where the turnover relates to goods previously sold in the State by a dealer liable to tax, and the assessee need not prove that the first seller actually remitted tax. Cancellation of the first seller&#039;s registration, or closure of its business during the assessment year, does not by itself negate the character of the earlier sale as a taxable sale. To deny the second-sale exemption, the revenue must establish that the alleged purchases were not genuine or that the bills were bogus; mere assumptions or presumptions are insufficient. On the facts stated, the assessee proved second sales and the turnover could not be taxed as first sales.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:17:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (7) TMI 332 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156297</link>
      <description>A second seller is entitled to exemption where the turnover relates to goods previously sold in the State by a dealer liable to tax, and the assessee need not prove that the first seller actually remitted tax. Cancellation of the first seller&#039;s registration, or closure of its business during the assessment year, does not by itself negate the character of the earlier sale as a taxable sale. To deny the second-sale exemption, the revenue must establish that the alleged purchases were not genuine or that the bills were bogus; mere assumptions or presumptions are insufficient. On the facts stated, the assessee proved second sales and the turnover could not be taxed as first sales.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>