<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 859 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156258</link>
    <description>A writ petition invoking extraordinary jurisdiction must be supported by a properly verified affidavit that distinguishes personal knowledge from information and belief and discloses the source of information where relevant. Material suppression, inconsistent stands, and perfunctory verification undermine candour and can disentitle the petitioner to interim or final relief. The text notes that allegations of unlawful telephone interception were not examined on merits because the petition was treated as unreliable and not fit for entertainment on merits. It also records that the interim restraint on publication was vacated and that affidavits were to be scrutinised strictly in future.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 15:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 859 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156258</link>
      <description>A writ petition invoking extraordinary jurisdiction must be supported by a properly verified affidavit that distinguishes personal knowledge from information and belief and discloses the source of information where relevant. Material suppression, inconsistent stands, and perfunctory verification undermine candour and can disentitle the petitioner to interim or final relief. The text notes that allegations of unlawful telephone interception were not examined on merits because the petition was treated as unreliable and not fit for entertainment on merits. It also records that the interim restraint on publication was vacated and that affidavits were to be scrutinised strictly in future.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>