https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156257 The Supreme Court ruled that the age limit for High Court Judges does not apply to the eligibility of the Advocate General. The Court criticized the misuse of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by a petitioner challenging the Advocate General's appointment, imposing costs and emphasizing the need for guidelines to prevent such abuse. The Court quashed the PIL proceedings, reinforcing the Advocate General's eligibility criteria and promoting judicial prudence to deter frivolous litigants. en-us Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Jun 2014 09:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156257 The Supreme Court ruled that the age limit for High Court Judges does not apply to the eligibility of the Advocate General. The Court criticized the misuse of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by a petitioner challenging the Advocate General's appointment, imposing costs and emphasizing the need for guidelines to prevent such abuse. The Court quashed the PIL proceedings, reinforcing the Advocate General's eligibility criteria and promoting judicial prudence to deter frivolous litigants. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156257