https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156255 A litigant seeking discretionary or writ relief must make full and frank disclosure of all material facts and approach the Court with clean hands. Here, the appellant suppressed the true basis for seeking to set aside an ex parte order, made misleading assertions about the proceedings and service of notice, and repeated the same false position before the Court. That conduct justified refusal of interference, especially where interim protection had already helped retain surplus land and delay ceiling proceedings. The challenge therefore failed and relief was denied on the ground of suppression and misrepresentation alone. en-us Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Nov 2025 17:47:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156255 A litigant seeking discretionary or writ relief must make full and frank disclosure of all material facts and approach the Court with clean hands. Here, the appellant suppressed the true basis for seeking to set aside an ex parte order, made misleading assertions about the proceedings and service of notice, and repeated the same false position before the Court. That conduct justified refusal of interference, especially where interim protection had already helped retain surplus land and delay ceiling proceedings. The challenge therefore failed and relief was denied on the ground of suppression and misrepresentation alone. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156255