<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 353 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156218</link>
    <description>Section 7(2A) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 required dealers to remit tax already collected by them at shorter notified intervals, and the amount retained its character as tax rather than advance tax. Failure to deposit that amount within the prescribed period amounted to failure to pay tax within the time allowed, so penalty under section 16(1)(b) applied to the default.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 15:54:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 353 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156218</link>
      <description>Section 7(2A) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 required dealers to remit tax already collected by them at shorter notified intervals, and the amount retained its character as tax rather than advance tax. Failure to deposit that amount within the prescribed period amounted to failure to pay tax within the time allowed, so penalty under section 16(1)(b) applied to the default.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>