<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 298 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156208</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the order requiring enhanced security under the Central Sales Tax Act, finding it exceeded the limit prescribed by section 7(3BB) and was based on local Act transactions rather than the Central Act. Emphasizing that security cannot exceed the tax payable under the Central Act, the Court ruled the order invalid, allowing the writ petition with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 14:57:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 298 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156208</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the order requiring enhanced security under the Central Sales Tax Act, finding it exceeded the limit prescribed by section 7(3BB) and was based on local Act transactions rather than the Central Act. Emphasizing that security cannot exceed the tax payable under the Central Act, the Court ruled the order invalid, allowing the writ petition with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>