<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (12) TMI 336 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156149</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court ruled in favor of classifying &quot;fried gram&quot; under entry 6-A of the Second Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act. The court set aside the orders of the Tribunal and other authorities, allowing the tax cases without imposing costs. The judgment emphasizes the need for consistent interpretation and application of tax laws to ensure clarity and uniformity in the classification and taxation of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (12) TMI 336 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156149</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court ruled in favor of classifying &quot;fried gram&quot; under entry 6-A of the Second Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act. The court set aside the orders of the Tribunal and other authorities, allowing the tax cases without imposing costs. The judgment emphasizes the need for consistent interpretation and application of tax laws to ensure clarity and uniformity in the classification and taxation of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>