<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 366 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156139</link>
    <description>Central sales tax under section 3(b) applies only where the sale is effected by transfer of documents of title to goods during movement from one State to another. On the facts found, the railway receipts were endorsed by the District Magistrate, not by the assessee, and the assessee received only commission for services rendered. As it neither obtained ownership nor control over the goods in transit, the transfer required by section 3(b) was not established against it. The taxable sale could not therefore be fastened in the assessee&#039;s hands, and the Tribunal&#039;s view treating it as liable to Central sales tax was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2013 12:02:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 366 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156139</link>
      <description>Central sales tax under section 3(b) applies only where the sale is effected by transfer of documents of title to goods during movement from one State to another. On the facts found, the railway receipts were endorsed by the District Magistrate, not by the assessee, and the assessee received only commission for services rendered. As it neither obtained ownership nor control over the goods in transit, the transfer required by section 3(b) was not established against it. The taxable sale could not therefore be fastened in the assessee&#039;s hands, and the Tribunal&#039;s view treating it as liable to Central sales tax was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>