https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156137 The Court dismissed the suits and writ petitions, emphasizing that the Home Minister's letter was not a binding directive, the grounds for invoking Article 356 were relevant, the President's satisfaction under Article 356 was not justiciable, the suits were not maintainable under Article 131, the writ petitions were not maintainable under Article 32, and the scope of judicial review over the President's proclamation under Article 356 was limited. The Court highlighted the significance of political wisdom and executive discretion in matters concerning Article 356. en-us Fri, 06 May 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 May 2018 15:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156137 The Court dismissed the suits and writ petitions, emphasizing that the Home Minister's letter was not a binding directive, the grounds for invoking Article 356 were relevant, the President's satisfaction under Article 356 was not justiciable, the suits were not maintainable under Article 131, the writ petitions were not maintainable under Article 32, and the scope of judicial review over the President's proclamation under Article 356 was limited. The Court highlighted the significance of political wisdom and executive discretion in matters concerning Article 356. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 May 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156137