<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (6) TMI 327 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156128</link>
    <description>Export exemption under section 5(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act applies only when the sale itself is integrally connected with export; sales of ferro-manganese to MMTC under the canalisation arrangement did not satisfy that test. Ferro-manganese was treated as falling within the expression &quot;manganese&quot; in entry 1 of the Second Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, so it escaped levy as general goods and the liability rested on the last purchaser in the State. Manganese slag was held to have a distinct commercial identity from manganese ore, so it could not be equated with ore for sales tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:01:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (6) TMI 327 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156128</link>
      <description>Export exemption under section 5(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act applies only when the sale itself is integrally connected with export; sales of ferro-manganese to MMTC under the canalisation arrangement did not satisfy that test. Ferro-manganese was treated as falling within the expression &quot;manganese&quot; in entry 1 of the Second Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, so it escaped levy as general goods and the liability rested on the last purchaser in the State. Manganese slag was held to have a distinct commercial identity from manganese ore, so it could not be equated with ore for sales tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>