<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (3) TMI 83 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156127</link>
    <description>Different statutory phrases were treated as deliberate, so &quot;rendered illegal&quot; in section 42(1)(g) was read as distinct from &quot;held illegal&quot; elsewhere in the Act. On that construction, an employer did not have to wait for a prior declaration under section 41 before taking disciplinary action against a workman for participating in a strike that appeared to fall within section 40. The Labour Commissioner, when deciding an application under section 16(3), could also determine the legality of the strike incidentally because section 41 did not confer exclusive jurisdiction on the industrial courts and the statutory scheme required an effective forum for relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (3) TMI 83 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156127</link>
      <description>Different statutory phrases were treated as deliberate, so &quot;rendered illegal&quot; in section 42(1)(g) was read as distinct from &quot;held illegal&quot; elsewhere in the Act. On that construction, an employer did not have to wait for a prior declaration under section 41 before taking disciplinary action against a workman for participating in a strike that appeared to fall within section 40. The Labour Commissioner, when deciding an application under section 16(3), could also determine the legality of the strike incidentally because section 41 did not confer exclusive jurisdiction on the industrial courts and the statutory scheme required an effective forum for relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>