https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156111 The High Court dismissed the appeal against the order disallowing the second application for amendment to the plaint for damages related to the right to pension. The court held that the new claim lacked special circumstances justifying its introduction, emphasizing the distinction between procedural amendments and those affecting substantive rights. The judgment clarified that an amendment removing a defense based on limitation constitutes a judgment as it impacts the merits of the controversy between the parties. Ultimately, the decision affirmed the High Court's ruling to disallow the amendment application. en-us Wed, 24 Jul 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156111 The High Court dismissed the appeal against the order disallowing the second application for amendment to the plaint for damages related to the right to pension. The court held that the new claim lacked special circumstances justifying its introduction, emphasizing the distinction between procedural amendments and those affecting substantive rights. The judgment clarified that an amendment removing a defense based on limitation constitutes a judgment as it impacts the merits of the controversy between the parties. Ultimately, the decision affirmed the High Court's ruling to disallow the amendment application. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Jul 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156111