<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (11) TMI 301 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156107</link>
    <description>Entry 6-A of the Fifth Schedule to the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 was construed to cover &quot;fish&quot; in general terms, without distinction between dry fish and fresh fish or between edible and non-edible fish. Administrative circulars could not narrow that statutory exemption by limiting it to fish sold for edible purposes, because implementation instructions cannot rewrite the exemption granted by the legislature. On that plain meaning, dry fish remained exempt, the proposed levy under section 5(1) on sale turnover and section 6 on purchase turnover was unsustainable, and the impugned tax notices were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:26:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (11) TMI 301 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156107</link>
      <description>Entry 6-A of the Fifth Schedule to the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 was construed to cover &quot;fish&quot; in general terms, without distinction between dry fish and fresh fish or between edible and non-edible fish. Administrative circulars could not narrow that statutory exemption by limiting it to fish sold for edible purposes, because implementation instructions cannot rewrite the exemption granted by the legislature. On that plain meaning, dry fish remained exempt, the proposed levy under section 5(1) on sale turnover and section 6 on purchase turnover was unsustainable, and the impugned tax notices were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>