<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (10) TMI 271 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156093</link>
    <description>Residual scrap generated while manufacturing shaped steel products from scrap already purchased and taxed was treated as part of the exempt end-products under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax exemption notification. Reading the notification with the Schedule entry treating iron and steel to include defectives, rejects, cuttings and end-pieces, the Court reasoned that the same raw material could not suffer a second levy merely because some residue remained after processing. The narrower contention that only the shaped products, and not the leftover scrap, fell within the exemption was rejected, and the garnishee notice was held invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:22:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (10) TMI 271 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156093</link>
      <description>Residual scrap generated while manufacturing shaped steel products from scrap already purchased and taxed was treated as part of the exempt end-products under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax exemption notification. Reading the notification with the Schedule entry treating iron and steel to include defectives, rejects, cuttings and end-pieces, the Court reasoned that the same raw material could not suffer a second levy merely because some residue remained after processing. The narrower contention that only the shaped products, and not the leftover scrap, fell within the exemption was rejected, and the garnishee notice was held invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>