<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (3) TMI 339 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156081</link>
    <description>Amendments treating sales at abnormally low prices as liable to reassessment were explained as prospective only, because they enlarged the basis of assessment and affected vested rights; absent express language or necessary implication, they could not reopen pre-1 July 1985 transactions. The provisions were also treated as vulnerable to vagueness because terms like &quot;prevailing market prices&quot; and &quot;abnormally low&quot; lacked statutory guidelines, so they were read down to operate only when workable legislative criteria exist. Reassessment based solely on comparison with market prices, without independent material showing actual suppression or escapement of turnover, was said to be unsustainable and liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:28:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (3) TMI 339 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156081</link>
      <description>Amendments treating sales at abnormally low prices as liable to reassessment were explained as prospective only, because they enlarged the basis of assessment and affected vested rights; absent express language or necessary implication, they could not reopen pre-1 July 1985 transactions. The provisions were also treated as vulnerable to vagueness because terms like &quot;prevailing market prices&quot; and &quot;abnormally low&quot; lacked statutory guidelines, so they were read down to operate only when workable legislative criteria exist. Reassessment based solely on comparison with market prices, without independent material showing actual suppression or escapement of turnover, was said to be unsustainable and liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>