<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 269 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156055</link>
    <description>Electrical energy was treated as goods for sales tax purposes, so a State levy on its sale had to conform to the constitutional allocation governing inter-State sales. Where electricity generated in Andhra Pradesh moved to other States under contracts of sale, the transactions answered the statutory test of inter-State sale and fell within Parliament&#039;s exclusive taxing domain. The absence of an express restrictive phrase in the electricity entry did not preserve State power to tax the same inter-State transaction. The levy on inter-State sales of electrical energy was therefore invalid, and refund followed according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 17:02:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 269 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156055</link>
      <description>Electrical energy was treated as goods for sales tax purposes, so a State levy on its sale had to conform to the constitutional allocation governing inter-State sales. Where electricity generated in Andhra Pradesh moved to other States under contracts of sale, the transactions answered the statutory test of inter-State sale and fell within Parliament&#039;s exclusive taxing domain. The absence of an express restrictive phrase in the electricity entry did not preserve State power to tax the same inter-State transaction. The levy on inter-State sales of electrical energy was therefore invalid, and refund followed according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>