https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156049 Writ interference under Article 226 is not warranted where the pleadings and affidavit material disclose serious indicia of fraud in obtaining sales tax registration. The material here showed false statements concerning residence, business activity, registration particulars, purchases and supporting documents, and indicated that the registration had been procured by furnishing false information. On that factual basis, the sales tax authorities' action was supported by the record then available, and the extraordinary writ jurisdiction was declined. The writ petition was therefore rejected. en-us Thu, 01 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:42:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156049 Writ interference under Article 226 is not warranted where the pleadings and affidavit material disclose serious indicia of fraud in obtaining sales tax registration. The material here showed false statements concerning residence, business activity, registration particulars, purchases and supporting documents, and indicated that the registration had been procured by furnishing false information. On that factual basis, the sales tax authorities' action was supported by the record then available, and the extraordinary writ jurisdiction was declined. The writ petition was therefore rejected. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 01 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156049