https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156038 An order passed in contempt proceedings that prejudicially affects a person's rights may be challenged by an aggrieved party, and the Court treated the ad interim injunction as amenable to intra-court review despite technical objections under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act and Clause 15 of the Letters Patent. However, contempt jurisdiction cannot ordinarily be used to grant substantive relief without a finding of contempt. The appellant's suppression of material facts, repeated attempts to obtain the same relief in other proceedings, and forum shopping amounted to abuse of process and disentitled it to equitable relief, so the challenge to the injunction failed and the High Court's order was left undisturbed. en-us Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156038 An order passed in contempt proceedings that prejudicially affects a person's rights may be challenged by an aggrieved party, and the Court treated the ad interim injunction as amenable to intra-court review despite technical objections under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act and Clause 15 of the Letters Patent. However, contempt jurisdiction cannot ordinarily be used to grant substantive relief without a finding of contempt. The appellant's suppression of material facts, repeated attempts to obtain the same relief in other proceedings, and forum shopping amounted to abuse of process and disentitled it to equitable relief, so the challenge to the injunction failed and the High Court's order was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156038