<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (3) TMI 331 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156021</link>
    <description>Section 17 of the A.P. General Sales Tax Act permits the assessing authority to require a person owing or potentially owing money to a dealer to pay it towards that dealer&#039;s tax arrears, subject to the recipient&#039;s right to dispute the liability. Section 28 permits authorised officers, on recorded suspicion of tax evasion, to obtain and seize relevant accounts, including records kept at a connected residential premises where procedural requirements are met. Although extended retention of seized records may be supported, originals should be returned after photocopies are retained for proceedings when prolonged custody is unnecessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:17:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (3) TMI 331 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156021</link>
      <description>Section 17 of the A.P. General Sales Tax Act permits the assessing authority to require a person owing or potentially owing money to a dealer to pay it towards that dealer&#039;s tax arrears, subject to the recipient&#039;s right to dispute the liability. Section 28 permits authorised officers, on recorded suspicion of tax evasion, to obtain and seize relevant accounts, including records kept at a connected residential premises where procedural requirements are met. Although extended retention of seized records may be supported, originals should be returned after photocopies are retained for proceedings when prolonged custody is unnecessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>