https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156016 The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the Sales Tax Tribunal's order, and directed the Sales Tax Officer to adjust the erroneously paid sales tax amount towards the tax assessed on the petitioner. The Court emphasized the principle of unjust enrichment, stating that the State should only receive what is legally due. It highlighted social justice and equity in granting relief under Article 226 and dismissed arguments against adjustment, emphasizing the importance of upholding the rule of law. No refund was permitted to the Assistant Soil Conservation Officers, and no costs were awarded. en-us Thu, 18 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Sep 2013 18:45:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156016 The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the Sales Tax Tribunal's order, and directed the Sales Tax Officer to adjust the erroneously paid sales tax amount towards the tax assessed on the petitioner. The Court emphasized the principle of unjust enrichment, stating that the State should only receive what is legally due. It highlighted social justice and equity in granting relief under Article 226 and dismissed arguments against adjustment, emphasizing the importance of upholding the rule of law. No refund was permitted to the Assistant Soil Conservation Officers, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 18 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156016