<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (5) TMI 306 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156009</link>
    <description>Supplies of cement and steel by the assessee to contractors for residential construction had to be tested on the contract as a whole to determine whether they were sales exigible to sales tax or only materials provided in execution of a works contract. The controlling question was the legal character of the supply clauses, read with the entire arrangement, rather than the form of individual provisions. Because the Tribunal had not applied the later governing precedent, the matter required fresh examination under the correct legal test. The Tribunal&#039;s order was set aside and the dispute remitted for reconsideration in accordance with the binding legal position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 18:01:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (5) TMI 306 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156009</link>
      <description>Supplies of cement and steel by the assessee to contractors for residential construction had to be tested on the contract as a whole to determine whether they were sales exigible to sales tax or only materials provided in execution of a works contract. The controlling question was the legal character of the supply clauses, read with the entire arrangement, rather than the form of individual provisions. Because the Tribunal had not applied the later governing precedent, the matter required fresh examination under the correct legal test. The Tribunal&#039;s order was set aside and the dispute remitted for reconsideration in accordance with the binding legal position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>