https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155997 Article 226 standing requires an enforceable legal right, and a contractual right directly curtailed by state action was sufficient to confer locus standi. Legislative competence over gas and gas-works was upheld by harmonising the Seventh Schedule entries so that the specific State entry retained effect and was not absorbed by the broader industry entry. Repugnancy was rejected because the central legislation could not validly extend to that field, and the ancillary restriction in Section 20 could not operate independently beyond Parliament's competence. The State law was therefore treated as a valid exercise of legislative power. en-us Mon, 05 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155997 Article 226 standing requires an enforceable legal right, and a contractual right directly curtailed by state action was sufficient to confer locus standi. Legislative competence over gas and gas-works was upheld by harmonising the Seventh Schedule entries so that the specific State entry retained effect and was not absorbed by the broader industry entry. Repugnancy was rejected because the central legislation could not validly extend to that field, and the ancillary restriction in Section 20 could not operate independently beyond Parliament's competence. The State law was therefore treated as a valid exercise of legislative power. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 05 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155997