<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 360 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155989</link>
    <description>In taxing statutes, the term &quot;vegetable&quot; is construed in its common parlance sense rather than in a broad botanical or natural-history sense. Applying that test, lucerne leaves, being edible greens capable of human consumption and ordinarily understood as vegetable matter, fall within the exemption entry under the relevant sales tax notification. Lucerne leaves were therefore treated as exempt from sales tax, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:34:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 360 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155989</link>
      <description>In taxing statutes, the term &quot;vegetable&quot; is construed in its common parlance sense rather than in a broad botanical or natural-history sense. Applying that test, lucerne leaves, being edible greens capable of human consumption and ordinarily understood as vegetable matter, fall within the exemption entry under the relevant sales tax notification. Lucerne leaves were therefore treated as exempt from sales tax, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>