<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (11) TMI 296 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155986</link>
    <description>An insurance company&#039;s sale of salvaged goods, after settling claims and taking possession of damaged goods, was treated as incidental and ancillary to its insurance business under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. The Court held that the statutory definition of &quot;business&quot; is inclusive and extends beyond principal trading activity to transactions connected with, or ancillary to, the main business. Because the disposal of salvage arose directly from claim settlement and recovery of value from damaged goods, it formed part of business for sales tax purposes. The company was therefore regarded as a dealer and was liable to registration and tax on the sale of salvaged goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:14:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (11) TMI 296 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155986</link>
      <description>An insurance company&#039;s sale of salvaged goods, after settling claims and taking possession of damaged goods, was treated as incidental and ancillary to its insurance business under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. The Court held that the statutory definition of &quot;business&quot; is inclusive and extends beyond principal trading activity to transactions connected with, or ancillary to, the main business. Because the disposal of salvage arose directly from claim settlement and recovery of value from damaged goods, it formed part of business for sales tax purposes. The company was therefore regarded as a dealer and was liable to registration and tax on the sale of salvaged goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>