<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 314 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155977</link>
    <description>A special and speedier recovery mechanism for sales tax dues from defaulting dealers was upheld as constitutionally valid because it did not create a new tax liability, operated as an ancillary recovery measure, and was neither arbitrary nor discriminatory merely because it was more drastic than the ordinary mode of recovery. The notices issued under that mechanism were, however, required to be re-examined because coercive recovery could be invoked only after the dealer had failed to pay within the time allowed and had become, or was deemed to have become, a defaulter; no further recovery action could proceed until such reconsideration after hearing the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:41:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 314 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155977</link>
      <description>A special and speedier recovery mechanism for sales tax dues from defaulting dealers was upheld as constitutionally valid because it did not create a new tax liability, operated as an ancillary recovery measure, and was neither arbitrary nor discriminatory merely because it was more drastic than the ordinary mode of recovery. The notices issued under that mechanism were, however, required to be re-examined because coercive recovery could be invoked only after the dealer had failed to pay within the time allowed and had become, or was deemed to have become, a defaulter; no further recovery action could proceed until such reconsideration after hearing the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>