https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155964 Where an alternative appellate remedy was available, the writ proceedings were not treated as the proper forum for a merits determination, and the controversy was left for the appellate authority to decide in accordance with law. The earlier merits finding was not sustained in writ jurisdiction because the material was insufficient for a conclusive decision at that stage. The appellant was also granted one month to file the appeal, and no objection as to limitation was to be raised if the appeal was filed within that period and one-third of the assessed sales tax was deposited; failing that deposit, the appeal would not be maintainable. en-us Mon, 15 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Sep 2013 14:47:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155964 Where an alternative appellate remedy was available, the writ proceedings were not treated as the proper forum for a merits determination, and the controversy was left for the appellate authority to decide in accordance with law. The earlier merits finding was not sustained in writ jurisdiction because the material was insufficient for a conclusive decision at that stage. The appellant was also granted one month to file the appeal, and no objection as to limitation was to be raised if the appeal was filed within that period and one-third of the assessed sales tax was deposited; failing that deposit, the appeal would not be maintainable. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 15 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155964