<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 269 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155962</link>
    <description>A reassessment order under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, read with the Central Sales Tax Act, could not stand where the High Court had already quashed the earlier reassessment notices for the same periods and that judgment had attained finality between the parties. The authority could not reopen the matter indirectly by relying on a later decision in another case without first getting the earlier binding adjudication set aside in appropriate proceedings. On that footing, the reassessment was held to lack legal foundation and was quashed as without jurisdiction, leaving the assessee protected by the earlier final judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 14:19:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 269 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155962</link>
      <description>A reassessment order under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, read with the Central Sales Tax Act, could not stand where the High Court had already quashed the earlier reassessment notices for the same periods and that judgment had attained finality between the parties. The authority could not reopen the matter indirectly by relying on a later decision in another case without first getting the earlier binding adjudication set aside in appropriate proceedings. On that footing, the reassessment was held to lack legal foundation and was quashed as without jurisdiction, leaving the assessee protected by the earlier final judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>