https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155945 A rectification notice and consequential order under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act were challenged on the ground that turnover under section 6B should not have been included in total turnover for levy under section 5. The Court held that an alleged legal mistake in assessment does not by itself mean absence of jurisdiction. The dispute was one of correctness of the assessment and could be taken before the statutory appellate forums under the Act. In view of that efficacious alternative remedy, recourse to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 was not warranted, and the rectification action was treated as not lacking jurisdiction. en-us Wed, 04 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Sep 2013 12:34:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155945 A rectification notice and consequential order under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act were challenged on the ground that turnover under section 6B should not have been included in total turnover for levy under section 5. The Court held that an alleged legal mistake in assessment does not by itself mean absence of jurisdiction. The dispute was one of correctness of the assessment and could be taken before the statutory appellate forums under the Act. In view of that efficacious alternative remedy, recourse to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 was not warranted, and the rectification action was treated as not lacking jurisdiction. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 04 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155945