<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 457 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155934</link>
    <description>Exemption under a sales tax notification should not be rejected merely because supporting certificates were issued after the stipulated period when the assessee had produced them before assessment and the delay was caused by the issuing department. The commentary states that, in such circumstances, the assessing authority should entertain the certificates and examine the exemption claim on merits rather than refuse consideration on a rigid time-limit basis. It further indicates that an assessment and demand founded solely on non-entertainment of the certificates would be unsustainable, with reconsideration required in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:44:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 457 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155934</link>
      <description>Exemption under a sales tax notification should not be rejected merely because supporting certificates were issued after the stipulated period when the assessee had produced them before assessment and the delay was caused by the issuing department. The commentary states that, in such circumstances, the assessing authority should entertain the certificates and examine the exemption claim on merits rather than refuse consideration on a rigid time-limit basis. It further indicates that an assessment and demand founded solely on non-entertainment of the certificates would be unsustainable, with reconsideration required in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>