<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (5) TMI 304 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155930</link>
    <description>Mere non-maintenance of a stock register does not automatically justify rejection of account books or resort to best judgment assessment. The governing rule is fact-specific: the tax authority must consider the totality of the record, including the surrounding books of account and the assessee&#039;s explanation, before treating the accounts as unreliable. Where the final fact-finding authority accepts the explanation as plausible and no inconsistency is found in the recorded transactions, interference is not warranted. On the facts noted, the account books could not be rejected solely because a stock register was not maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:29:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (5) TMI 304 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155930</link>
      <description>Mere non-maintenance of a stock register does not automatically justify rejection of account books or resort to best judgment assessment. The governing rule is fact-specific: the tax authority must consider the totality of the record, including the surrounding books of account and the assessee&#039;s explanation, before treating the accounts as unreliable. Where the final fact-finding authority accepts the explanation as plausible and no inconsistency is found in the recorded transactions, interference is not warranted. On the facts noted, the account books could not be rejected solely because a stock register was not maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>