<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 359 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155922</link>
    <description>Binola chhilka, used as an additive in cattle feed, was held to fall within the ordinary meaning of &quot;fodder&quot; in entry 34 of Schedule B to the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973. Because the Act and Rules did not define &quot;fodder&quot; and there was no evidence of any special commercial meaning, the court applied the term&#039;s ordinary sense and treated cottonseed chhilka as residual roughage forming a staple part of animal food. The exclusion in entry 34 covered oil-cakes, guar giri, and chhilka of foodgrains and pulses, but not cottonseed chhilka. Binola chhilka was therefore treated as exempt from tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:35:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 359 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155922</link>
      <description>Binola chhilka, used as an additive in cattle feed, was held to fall within the ordinary meaning of &quot;fodder&quot; in entry 34 of Schedule B to the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973. Because the Act and Rules did not define &quot;fodder&quot; and there was no evidence of any special commercial meaning, the court applied the term&#039;s ordinary sense and treated cottonseed chhilka as residual roughage forming a staple part of animal food. The exclusion in entry 34 covered oil-cakes, guar giri, and chhilka of foodgrains and pulses, but not cottonseed chhilka. Binola chhilka was therefore treated as exempt from tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>