https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155912 The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposition orders, treating the deposited amount as security, and directed the Commercial Tax Officer to review the seizure and penalty imposition propriety within a month based on previous judgments. The Tribunal disapproved of the form of notices issued, instructed the Officer to notify applicants of the hearing date, and disseminate judgment copies to relevant check-posts for guidance. No costs were awarded in the case involving the delay in filing seizure of goods applications. en-us Thu, 08 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:00:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155912 The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposition orders, treating the deposited amount as security, and directed the Commercial Tax Officer to review the seizure and penalty imposition propriety within a month based on previous judgments. The Tribunal disapproved of the form of notices issued, instructed the Officer to notify applicants of the hearing date, and disseminate judgment copies to relevant check-posts for guidance. No costs were awarded in the case involving the delay in filing seizure of goods applications. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 08 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155912