<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (4) TMI 306 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155908</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 15-A(1)(o) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 was held unsustainable where import was accompanied by an obsolete declaration form but the breach was only technical. Section 28-A is aimed at preventing tax evasion on import of goods, and penalty depends on material showing an attempt to evade assessment or payment of tax. The declaration form had been valid when issued, later became obsolete, and a fresh form was obtained shortly after the check-post seizure. No dishonest intention or contumacious conduct was found, and a quasi-criminal penalty cannot rest on a mere venial lapse without conscious wrongdoing. The revision therefore succeeded in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 17:21:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (4) TMI 306 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155908</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 15-A(1)(o) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 was held unsustainable where import was accompanied by an obsolete declaration form but the breach was only technical. Section 28-A is aimed at preventing tax evasion on import of goods, and penalty depends on material showing an attempt to evade assessment or payment of tax. The declaration form had been valid when issued, later became obsolete, and a fresh form was obtained shortly after the check-post seizure. No dishonest intention or contumacious conduct was found, and a quasi-criminal penalty cannot rest on a mere venial lapse without conscious wrongdoing. The revision therefore succeeded in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>