<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (6) TMI 269 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155900</link>
    <description>Pea-gravels used as tube-well packing material were held not to fall within item 29 of the Tripura Sales Tax Act Schedule as stone, stone chips, or a product or sub-product of stone. The entry had to be interpreted in common, trade, or commercial parlance, and the assessing authority&#039;s nomenclature was not conclusive. Because pea-gravels are not ordinarily understood as stone or stone chips and are used for filtration and percolation in tube-wells rather than building or road construction, they were outside the taxable entry. The assessment under item 29 was therefore liable to be quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:27:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (6) TMI 269 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155900</link>
      <description>Pea-gravels used as tube-well packing material were held not to fall within item 29 of the Tripura Sales Tax Act Schedule as stone, stone chips, or a product or sub-product of stone. The entry had to be interpreted in common, trade, or commercial parlance, and the assessing authority&#039;s nomenclature was not conclusive. Because pea-gravels are not ordinarily understood as stone or stone chips and are used for filtration and percolation in tube-wells rather than building or road construction, they were outside the taxable entry. The assessment under item 29 was therefore liable to be quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>