<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 262 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155895</link>
    <description>A credit note issued as a quality allowance can reduce taxable turnover where the parties, after complaint and inspection, effectively revise the sale price by subsequent dealing and correspondence. The goods were originally priced at Rs. 65 per kg., but the seller accepted the quality issue and the ultimate price realised was Rs. 51 per kg. On that basis, the adjustment was treated as a substituted sale price rather than a post-sale concession, so only the real consideration formed part of turnover under the Central Sales Tax Act, read with the Sale of Goods Act. The disputed amount was therefore excluded from taxable turnover.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:07:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 262 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155895</link>
      <description>A credit note issued as a quality allowance can reduce taxable turnover where the parties, after complaint and inspection, effectively revise the sale price by subsequent dealing and correspondence. The goods were originally priced at Rs. 65 per kg., but the seller accepted the quality issue and the ultimate price realised was Rs. 51 per kg. On that basis, the adjustment was treated as a substituted sale price rather than a post-sale concession, so only the real consideration formed part of turnover under the Central Sales Tax Act, read with the Sale of Goods Act. The disputed amount was therefore excluded from taxable turnover.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>