https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155863 The reference application failed because the proposed questions did not disclose any referable question of law arising from the Tribunal's appellate order. The first four questions were held to be factual, relating to tax-paid purchases without bills, exemption for groundnut husk under a government notification, and tax on cancelled bills. The remaining questions were also not referable because they either did not arise from the order or depended on disputed facts not shown to have been urged before the Tribunal. The High Court therefore held that no reference was required and dismissed the application. en-us Thu, 04 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Sep 2013 16:18:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155863 The reference application failed because the proposed questions did not disclose any referable question of law arising from the Tribunal's appellate order. The first four questions were held to be factual, relating to tax-paid purchases without bills, exemption for groundnut husk under a government notification, and tax on cancelled bills. The remaining questions were also not referable because they either did not arise from the order or depended on disputed facts not shown to have been urged before the Tribunal. The High Court therefore held that no reference was required and dismissed the application. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 04 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155863