<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 400 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155861</link>
    <description>Where a revision is barred because an appeal lies under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954, the revisional authority cannot issue ancillary directions affecting the appellate process. Time spent in pursuing an incompetent revision cannot be excluded by that authority for computing limitation for a future appeal; that question belongs to the appellate authority. The authority also cannot direct that a stay order passed in the incompetent revision continue until disposal of the appeal, because any interim relief granted in proceedings beyond jurisdiction cannot be extended after dismissal. Such ancillary directions were held invalid as beyond jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 16:11:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 400 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155861</link>
      <description>Where a revision is barred because an appeal lies under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954, the revisional authority cannot issue ancillary directions affecting the appellate process. Time spent in pursuing an incompetent revision cannot be excluded by that authority for computing limitation for a future appeal; that question belongs to the appellate authority. The authority also cannot direct that a stay order passed in the incompetent revision continue until disposal of the appeal, because any interim relief granted in proceedings beyond jurisdiction cannot be extended after dismissal. Such ancillary directions were held invalid as beyond jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>