<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 389 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155845</link>
    <description>Revision jurisdiction extended to an assessing authority where the amendment&#039;s inclusive expression &quot;any person&quot; covers the officer having jurisdiction over the dealer, and the Commissioner&#039;s authorisation supports filing. State interest and penalty provisions may apply in Central sales tax assessments where the statutory scheme incorporates them. Interest becomes automatic when liability arises, whereas penalty requires a finding that the failure occurred without reasonable cause. The material describes rejection of the maintainability objection, restoration of interest levies, and limited disturbance of penalty relief because no remand was ordered after a prolonged lapse of time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 14:44:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 389 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155845</link>
      <description>Revision jurisdiction extended to an assessing authority where the amendment&#039;s inclusive expression &quot;any person&quot; covers the officer having jurisdiction over the dealer, and the Commissioner&#039;s authorisation supports filing. State interest and penalty provisions may apply in Central sales tax assessments where the statutory scheme incorporates them. Interest becomes automatic when liability arises, whereas penalty requires a finding that the failure occurred without reasonable cause. The material describes rejection of the maintainability objection, restoration of interest levies, and limited disturbance of penalty relief because no remand was ordered after a prolonged lapse of time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>