<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (11) TMI 337 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155834</link>
    <description>Acceptance of account books was upheld because the appellate authority and Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation for the turnover difference and found compliance with the record-keeping requirement under the U.P. Sales Tax Act; no error of law in that appreciation of evidence was shown. Zinc dross was also treated as taxable at 1% rather than as an unclassified item at 3%, because an earlier judicial classification had already identified it as zinc, and the revenue&#039;s relied-upon authorities concerned different commodities. The revision therefore failed and the Tribunal&#039;s order remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 14:06:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (11) TMI 337 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155834</link>
      <description>Acceptance of account books was upheld because the appellate authority and Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation for the turnover difference and found compliance with the record-keeping requirement under the U.P. Sales Tax Act; no error of law in that appreciation of evidence was shown. Zinc dross was also treated as taxable at 1% rather than as an unclassified item at 3%, because an earlier judicial classification had already identified it as zinc, and the revenue&#039;s relied-upon authorities concerned different commodities. The revision therefore failed and the Tribunal&#039;s order remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>